DMD maskless lithography opticsPalo Alto, California
    DIRECT IMAGING / DMD / PROJECTION

    DMD projection optics engineered around dose, resolution, field, and throughput.

    PAO develops maskless exposure optical engines from source coupling and DMD illumination through projection, focus, calibration, and production-ready optomechanics.

    SYSTEM WORKFLOWPAO / 01
    01UV source
    02Homogenizer
    03DMD
    04Projection optics
    05Substrate

    For PCB, advanced packaging, microfabrication, and application-specific direct imaging.

    A DMD engine is a coupled radiometric and imaging system.

    Pixel mapping, source etendue, DMD state contrast, projection NA, distortion, focus, thermal load, scan or stitching strategy, and resist response all affect the usable process window.

    01

    Dose and image quality

    Balance optical efficiency with contrast, feature transfer, edge behavior, and usable depth of focus.

    02

    Field and registration

    Control distortion, magnification, focus surface, pixel mapping, stitching, and stage-to-optics calibration.

    03

    Thermal and lifetime behavior

    Manage source heat, spectral stability, contamination, DMD loading, and alignment drift over duty cycle.

    PAO is the right fit when a DMD engine must meet both image quality and production constraints.

    Best for teams ready to close process decisions around dose, mapping, source spectrum, and calibration into one controlled optical-engine program.

    01

    Process targets are clear but the architecture is unresolved

    Feature size, dwell, dose, resist, and throughput are known, but source-to-projection coupling and mapping strategy are still open.

    02

    Uniformity, registration, or yield is unstable

    Field roll-off, stitching mismatch, distortion drift, or thermal-induced drift is reducing repeatability during prototype runs.

    03

    You need supplier-ready transfer

    A bench build exists, but procurement is blocked by missing tolerances, calibration maps, test conditions, and issue-tracking format.

    ENGINEERING DECISION TABLE

    Inputs that change the architecture, acceptance method, and program risk.

    Input conditionKey metricDesign choiceRisk if unresolved
    Feature and throughput targetMinimum resolvable feature, cycle time, dose uniformityLine-imaging versus projection mode, NA, zoom strategy, source and duty settingsThroughput can increase while critical pitch quality degrades.
    Source and process chemistrySpectral response, conversion efficiency, contrast, agingLED or LD architecture, band set, thermal control, monitoring pointsIncorrect source strategy can hide process drifts and overpromise stability.
    Calibration and mapping pathPixel mapping error, distortion residual, registration repeatabilityMapping grid, correction order, distortion model, reference artifactAcceptance may fail during stage transitions or production setup changes.
    Procurement and production readinessSupplier lead time, qualification scope, test method consistencyControlled BOMs, drawings, optical/mechanical package, release criteriaThe prototype cannot be converted to reliable pilot manufacturing.
    SELECTED ENGINEERING EVIDENCE

    Published scope, verification method, and disclosure boundary.

    These records describe documented engineering experience or the evidence plan PAO uses for new work. They do not imply that prior-employer programs were PAO customer engagements.

    DMD projection architecture evidence

    Scope
    Typical DMD architecture and interface stack including illumination strategy, projection layout, and integration interfaces.
    Verification
    Feature transfer and uniformity are closed against defined process conditions and measurable acceptance limits.
    Boundary
    Specific customer results, exact dimensions, and supplier identities are not published.
    View documented optical systems experience

    Delivery framework for new PAO work

    Scope
    Requirements trace, source mapping, calibration plan, change control, acceptance evidence, supplier handoff format.
    Verification
    Decision gates include defined input assumptions, measurement conditions, and pass/fail criteria before supplier transfer.
    Boundary
    Performance promises are only confirmed after requirements completion and acceptance confirmation.
    Review project delivery framework

    Engineering from the source package to the resist plane.

    The optical engine is developed against the actual exposure process rather than treated as an isolated projection lens.

    Define a technical work package
    01

    Process and pixel budget

    Feature target, resist sensitivity, pixel scale, magnification, overlap, throughput, and focus allocation.

    02

    Source and illumination

    LED or laser-diode coupling, spectral selection, fly-eye or light-pipe homogenization, pupil fill, and radiometry.

    03

    DMD integration

    Device format, tilt geometry, illumination angle, contrast paths, window effects, cooling, and mechanical interface.

    04

    Projection optics

    Magnification, NA, modulation transfer, distortion, telecentricity, focus surface, and chromatic control.

    05

    Calibration strategy

    Pixel-to-stage mapping, geometric correction, uniformity correction, autofocus interface, and image verification.

    06

    Build and transfer

    Precision mounting, alignment sequence, tolerance model, optical acceptance, and supplier-ready release.

    Real optical-engine starting points, adapted to the customer process.

    These configurations demonstrate available delivery pathways. PAO defines the production requirement, system interfaces, calibration, verification, and changes needed for the intended application.

    DMD direct-imaging optical-engine hardware for 405 nanometer line lithography
    REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE / LINE IMAGING

    405 nm DMD direct imaging

    A configurable optical-engine starting point for line-layer exposure. PAO adapts the architecture, interfaces, calibration, and acceptance plan to the customer's process.

    Wavelength
    405 nm
    Optical range
    1.3x to 2.7x
    Feature class
    15 to 50 um reference
    Mixed-wavelength DMD direct-imaging optical-engine hardware for solder-mask exposure
    REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE / SOLDER MASK

    Mixed-wavelength DMD exposure

    A source-flexible engine architecture for solder-mask and substrate applications requiring process-specific spectral and thermal design.

    LED options
    365/385 nm
    LD band
    375 to 440 nm
    Process class
    50 to 150 um reference

    Architecture options for direct-imaging processes.

    Representative capability is shown with the context needed to qualify it. Program requirements control the final architecture and acceptance values.

    01

    PCB line imaging

    Projection architectures for fine line and space patterning with controlled field mapping and focus.

    02

    Solder-mask exposure

    Mixed-wavelength or application-tuned UV delivery for photosensitive solder-mask processes.

    03

    Advanced packaging

    Maskless exposure for substrates, redistribution-related processes, and specialized microfabrication steps.

    04

    Custom direct imaging

    Purpose-built DMD engines for research, additive, patterning, curing, and machine-integrated applications.

    REFERENCE ENVELOPE
    Line-imaging reference405 nmRepresentative direct-imaging architecture
    Projection range1.3x to 2.7xReference platform envelope; project design may differ
    Published feature class15 to 50 umProcess-dependent reference, not a guaranteed resolution
    Solder-mask sources365/385 nm LED or 375 to 440 nm LDSelected against resist and dose requirements
    Published process class50 to 150 umReference envelope for solder-mask applications

    The values above describe representative platform envelopes. Feature transfer depends on resist, substrate, dose, contrast, focus, motion, calibration, and acceptance method; final performance is defined and verified per program.

    Engineering outputs your team can review, build, test, and maintain.

    The exact package follows the program stage and scope. Assumptions, interfaces, decisions, and acceptance evidence remain visible.

    Exposure architecture

    Source-to-substrate optical layout, power budget, pixel budget, interfaces, and risk register.

    Illumination design

    Source coupling, homogenizer, relay, pupil control, filters, thermal inputs, and irradiance model.

    Projection design

    Lens prescription, magnification, MTF, distortion, telecentricity, focus, and tolerance analyses.

    Calibration definition

    Mapping, distortion and uniformity correction, focus procedure, artifacts, and data products.

    Engine integration package

    DMD, optical, mechanical, thermal, stage, controls, and service interfaces.

    Prototype-to-production support

    Build oversight, alignment, test correlation, issue closure, and configuration-controlled release.

    A local engineering interface from first review through release.

    PAO leads the technical work, coordinates specialized fabrication and production resources under the project quality process, and keeps responsibility for requirements, interfaces, evidence, and issue closure clear.

    1. 01

      Technical intake

      Define the system boundary, decision to be made, current evidence, constraints, and confidentiality path.

    2. 02

      Requirements and risk

      Create measurable requirements, interface assumptions, performance budgets, and a ranked technical risk register.

    3. 03

      Architecture and proof

      Compare viable concepts and retire the highest-risk assumptions with analysis, breadboards, or targeted tests.

    4. 04

      Detailed engineering

      Develop controlled optical, mechanical, calibration, test, and supplier-ready documentation.

    5. 05

      Build and verification

      Support procurement, assembly, alignment, test correlation, root cause, and evidence-based iteration.

    6. 06

      Release and transfer

      Close acceptance criteria, configuration, supplier questions, manufacturing issues, and production handoff.

    Questions engineering teams ask before engaging.

    01Do you provide only a projection lens or the complete optical engine?

    Either scope is possible. For lower integration risk, PAO typically defines source, illumination, DMD, projection, optomechanics, calibration, and test as one controlled subsystem.

    02Can one architecture support multiple wavelengths?

    Potentially, but coatings, materials, focus, source etendue, detector response, and resist sensitivity must be evaluated together. A wavelength choice should be treated as a system trade, not a component substitution.

    03What determines achievable feature size?

    Pixel scale, projection NA, aberrations, contrast, focus, vibration, dose, resist behavior, substrate flatness, motion, and image processing all contribute. PAO establishes a traceable budget and verification method for the target process.

    Define the process window before selecting the engine.

    Send the feature, field, resist, wavelength, dose, working distance, and throughput targets available today. Unknowns can be handled as explicit trades.