Technical archive

    ISO 10110 Optical Drawing Guide

    An ISO 10110 drawing should communicate functionally necessary material, geometry, surface, centering, coating, environmental, and inspection requirements without forcing an impractical process. Every tolerance needs a defined datum, test method, wavelength or condition, and relationship to the assembled optical budget.

    Palo Alto Optics Engineering7 minUpdated Jul 31, 2026
    ISO 10110 Optical Drawing Guide

    ISO 10110 Optical Drawing Guide

    An ISO 10110 drawing should communicate functionally necessary material, geometry, surface, centering, coating, environmental, and inspection requirements without forcing an impractical process. Every tolerance needs a defined datum, test method, wavelength or condition, and relationship to the assembled optical budget.

    Why this decision matters

    This choice affects more than nominal optical performance. It changes package volume, tolerance sensitivity, supplier options, alignment effort, calibration, test equipment, production yield, and the evidence required before release. The correct answer therefore comes from the complete operating condition and acceptance method, not from a single catalog value.

    Key engineering decisions

    • Flow system tolerances to measurable component controls.
    • Use datums that survive fabrication and assembly.
    • Align drawing notation with supplier metrology.

    These decisions should be captured in a requirement or trade study before the team commits long-lead components. Where requirements conflict, rank the product priorities explicitly so optimization does not hide a business decision.

    Specification checklist

    • Material and grade
    • Diameter and thickness
    • Surface form and irregularity
    • Centration and wedge
    • Coating and cosmetic quality

    Every value should state the condition where it applies and how it will be measured. A specification without a defined test condition is not yet an acceptance requirement.

    Common failure mode

    A drawing is mathematically complete but ambiguous to manufacture or inspect, leading suppliers to quote different interpretations.

    The practical remedy is to compare the nominal model, tolerance prediction, mechanical interfaces, and measured configuration together. Treating the symptom as an isolated lens or component problem often produces another build with the same system-level limitation.

    Verification approach

    Conduct supplier drawing review, compare proposed methods with the tolerance model, and reconcile first-article reports with assembled performance.

    Record the hardware revision, source or scene, wavelength, aperture, field point, focus or alignment state, environmental condition, processing, and measurement uncertainty. This makes the result useful for design iteration and supplier transfer rather than only for a one-time demonstration.

    What to send PAO

    Send the prescription, current drawing, tolerance analysis, assembly datums, environment, quantity, supplier feedback, and acceptance test.

    PAO applies this framework through optical prototype development, from requirements and architecture through detailed design, prototype evidence, and manufacturing transfer.

    Need engineering support?

    Apply the technical context to your system.

    Discuss a program